DOREMI
2021 CardiologyMilrinone as compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock
Clinical Question
In patients with cardiogenic shock, does milrinone as compared with dobutamine improve the composite outcome of in-hospital death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, receipt of cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support, non-fatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event or renal replacement therapy?
Critical Appraisal
Key findings
Primary outcome: no significant difference in the composite of in-hospital death,
resuscitated cardiac arrest, receipt of cardiac transplant or mechanical
support, non-fatal myocardial infarcation, cerebrovascular event or renal
replacement therapy. Comparing milrinone vs dobutamine group 49% vs 54% (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.69 – 1.19, p = 0.47)
Critique
In patients with cardiogenic shock, no significant difference between
milrinone and dobutamine was found with respect to the primary composite
outcome or important secondary outcomes
- Population
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Population Details
- Not recorded
- Intervention Arms
-
Milrinone
- Control Arms
-
Dobutamine
- Primary Outcome
- Composite
- Secondary Outcomes
- Not recorded
- P Value
- 0.47
Outcome Results
Not recorded
Primary location: Canada