DOREMI

2021 Cardiology
1 ICUs
192 patients

Milrinone as compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock

Clinical Question

In patients with cardiogenic shock, does milrinone as compared with dobutamine improve the composite outcome of in-hospital death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, receipt of cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support, non-fatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event or renal replacement therapy?

Critical Appraisal

Key findings

Primary outcome: no significant difference in the composite of in-hospital death,
resuscitated cardiac arrest, receipt of cardiac transplant or mechanical
support, non-fatal myocardial infarcation, cerebrovascular event or renal
replacement therapy. Comparing milrinone vs dobutamine group 49% vs 54% (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.69 – 1.19, p = 0.47)

Critique

In patients with cardiogenic shock, no significant difference between
milrinone and dobutamine was found with respect to the primary composite
outcome or important secondary outcomes

Population
Cardiogenic Shock
Population Details
Not recorded
Intervention Arms

Milrinone

Control Arms

Dobutamine

Primary Outcome
Composite
Secondary Outcomes
Not recorded
P Value
0.47

Outcome Results

Not recorded