CHARLI
2021Nebulised heparin for patients with or at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial
Clinical Question
In patients with or at risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS),
can nebulised heparin compared to placebo, accelerate recovery of physical
function?
Critical Appraisal
Key findings
Primary outcome: SF-36 Physical Function Score (patient or proxy reported limitations across
ten physical activities) of survivors at day 60 – no significant differenceIntervention group vs control group: (95% CI): 53.6 vs 48.7, MD 4.9 (-4.8
to 14.5) – a lower score indicates worse limitation
Critique
“The CHARLI study found that nebulised heparin therapy, compared with
placebo, in invasively ventilated intensive care patients with impaired
oxygenation and the expectation of invasive ventilation beyond the next
calendar day, did not improve the SF-36 Physical Function of survivors at
day 60”
- Population
- ARDS
- Population Details
- Not recorded
- Intervention Arms
-
Heparin
25 000 IU in 5 mL, administered using a vibrating mesh membrane nebuliser every 6 hours to day 10 while invasively ventilated - Control Arms
-
Placebo
- Primary Outcome
- SF-36 Physical Function Score at day 60 days
- Secondary Outcomes
- Not recorded
- P Value
- Not recorded
Outcome Results
Not recorded
Primary location: Australia